Alarmist meteorologist to colleagues: If you believe global warming is a scam, then it's a "mistake" to talk about the climate to your viewers!

Written by Emilie Lorditch, PhysOrg | June 26 2010

If only we could cool down Jim Gandy's rhetoric (middle).

What Weathermen Know About Climate Change

Climate change is a topic that impacts the weather not only globally, but also locally. While some people may be concerned about the melting ice sheets at the far corners of the Earth, what most really want to know is "how will global warming affect me?" -- and they often turn to their local weatherperson to find out.

A study released today study by the George Mason University Center for Climate Change Communication in Fairfax, Va., showed that 27 percent of broadcast meteorologists -- who are, according to the National Institutes of Standards and Technology, "often the most visible representatives of science in U.S. households" -- believe that global warming  is a scam.

According to the National Science Foundation’s 2010 Science and Engineering Indicators, television is the number one source the public turns to for information about science and technology. Broadcast meteorologists are often the only people at TV news stations with a science background. But the education and experience of those who deliver news about the weather varies dramatically.

"In television, when it comes to weather, there is an extremely wide range of education sets," said Jim Gandy, chief meteorologist at WLTX-TV in Columbia, S.C. "Some have bachelor’s degrees, master’s degrees, and Ph.D.'s, but you also have some without."

When a topic such as climate change comes up in the news, broadcast meteorologists -- no matter what their educational background -- are often thrust into the spotlight. Some embrace the opportunity and try to educate their audiences on the science, while others avoid it at all costs.

"People are uninformed and believe climate change is a hoax," said Gandy. "I occasionally respond to comments posted on our station's website, but you better know your science and get your facts straight before you post on my website."

Some meteorologists surveyed said that there is a lot of conflicting information about climate change.

"Science is about questioning things and I think we should all be in the middle, question the information," said Brad Sowder, First Alert Meteorologist at KOAA-TV in Colorado Springs, Colo. "I have been more on the side of a skeptic."

Another weathercaster who wanted to remain anonymous felt that the topic of climate change is less about the science and more about politics. "Personally, I think that global warming is a political issue, and I feel like it is safer to stay out of it," he said.

The survey also found that 62 percent of broadcast meteorologists want to report more on climate change.

"We have a good comprehensive look at television weathercasters from this survey," said Kris Wilson, a senior lecturer with the School of Journalism at University of Texas at Austin and one of the lead investigators of the survey.

Beginning in July, the next phase of the National Science Foundation-funded study will begin. A test case at Gandy’s station will include 30-second segments in some of the weathercasts to educate viewers about climate change.

"It will be a year-long effort using our resources on-air and on the Internet in an effort to educate the public about climate change past, present, and future," said Gandy. "I wish the public knew how difficult it is to have knowledge of climate science. Simply being a meteorologist is not enough, and this is a mistake that some television meteorologists make."

Source

Comments   

 

# anne 2010-06-27 00:50

They don't open their mouths because they know that telling the truth about the AGW scam will lose them their jobs. I work in the social sciences, a science of nature v nurture, where theory test and experimental evidence changes daily. This tells us to question, question and question again, as should every scientific theory. Science is not philosophy, idealism, political or what we want it to be, it is a theory that is tested out again and again by trusted scientists who have nothing to gain by proving or disproving their model. When the whole structure of society is set to change on a theory that has not been proved, where the evidence has been tampered with, or alternative evidence ignored, either to gain funding or to attain political change, it is fraud.

Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator

 

 

# Gator 2010-06-27 11:54

I have no problem with weathermen educating their viewers on climate change. What I am concerned with is indoctrination.

Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator

 

 

# Eric 2010-06-28 12:32

They have been unable to prove that the scam label is false and that the lies that have come out showing them to tweak the data to fit the claims (the hockey puck graphic and the emails) are not true. They don't wish to lose easy money from grants from politicians that wish to gather power. The CO2 claims are bogus as well.

Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator

 

Refresh comments list
RSS feed for comments to this post

Add comment

Before posting a comment, please read the Terms of Service (click here). Long links are shortened but still work. Emails not shown.

Use your Gravatar username and email address to show your custom avatar. Want your own avatar? Sign up here.

If you post an image, please upload to a photo-sharing service like ImageShack or TinyPic and use the link they provide you. Do NOT link directly to the photo's source unless you have permission.

PLEASE report all spam/inappropriate comments using the 'Report to Admin' link. If you find your post gone, it is because you violated the TOS above or it was in reply to a deleted comment.

Name (required)

E-mail (required, but will not display)

Notify me of follow-up comments

Refresh

Send

Cancel

JComments