Flashback: JunkScience predicts outcome of EPA ‘endangerment finding’ litigation
We aren’t K St. lawyers bilking deep-pocketed clients at $500+ per hour — but we knew the endangerment finding litigation against the EPA was doomed from the start.
In our Dec. 28, 2010 posting “GOP all set to wimp out?“, we wrote:
… Moreover, while the portion of the EPA’s climate rules that is flagrantly illegal is likely to be overturned (i.e., the so-called “tailoring rule” under which EPA unilaterally amended the Clean Air Act to limit regulation of greenhouse gases from 100-ton emitters to 75,000-ton emitters), it is unlikely that the Court will overturn the EPA’s so-called “endangerment funding” (which declares that greenhouse gases are a threat to the public welfare).
Under the 1984 Supreme Court case Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, it is extremely difficult to show that an agency has acted arbitrarily and capriciously in violation of the Administrative Procedures Act…
Following today’s DC Circuit Appellate Court hearing on the endangerment finding, the Wall Street Journal reported:
… During the first day of court hearings, members of a three-judge panel said they were required by law to give deference to the EPA’s finding that greenhouse-gas emissions were very likely responsible for most global warming over the last half-century, and were a threat to humans and the environment.
To prevail, the industry challengers would have to show the EPA’s findings were arbitrary, capricious or an abuse of government discretion.
“You seem to be asking us to determine that the EPA is incorrect, but that is not the standard,” Chief Judge David Sentelle told a lawyer for the challengers. Such a determination “would not be enough to win the case for you,” he said…
As we pointed out in “GOP all set to wimp out?,” Energy and Commerce Chairman Fred Upton and other Congressional GOP were entirely wrong to rely on litigation to save America from EPA greenhouse gas regulation.
Congressional GOP have had the power, but have failed to do anything to stop the Obama EPA since the 112th Congress commenced. Shame on them.
Add comment
Before posting a comment, please read the Terms of Service (click here). Long links are shortened but still work.
PLEASE report all spam/inappropriate comments using the 'Report to administrator' link. If you find your post gone, it's because you violated the TOS.

Comments
We the people have lost our sovereignty.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=yiO-RBHy6X0
There is no place in human society for these monsters, and no words can describe this kind of mind boggling evil.
nuggetsscraps.This is why we have the 2nd amendment.
Those who enlist to do the minimum and get out may support him, especially those in "special interest" categories such as gays.
But the lifers, the career military types, they won't support him. He's already pissing them off by cutting their health benefits. What army would the politicians call upon to defend themselves if things really go wonky?
I don't know where things are going to go, but I expect it is going to get really damn ugly before it gets better.
This is the US military oath of enlistment:
Quote:Notice that defending the Constitution comes before obeying the orders of the President.
Also notice it states "against all enemies foreign and domestic." What happens when the president becomes one of those enemies?
Let me fix that for you.
What happens when the president
becomesis one of those enemies?That's better.
Which brings me to how Obama's America treats it's friends... Yeah, I really want China to get our resources over the States. We are old friends and allies, I would rather enrichen you than anyone else (Note: Ontario and east get their oil from the North Sea (Norway) and Algeria!!!) WE NEED PIPELINES TOO!!!
Obama handed over the serial numbers for all of Britain's Trident nuke missiles and stopped stationing anti-missile bases in Poland and the Czech Republic as demanded by Russia to continue START II negotiations.
I won't go into the litany of slight's the OBAMA regime has foisted on Israel but the latest is beyond acceptable... "(Reuters) - Defense Secretary Leon Panetta believes there is a growing possibility Israel will attack Iran as early as April to stop Tehran from building a nuclear bomb, U.S. media reported on Thursday." www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/03/us-nuclear-iran-usa-israel-idUSTRE81202Z20120203
Note to the a**wipe Obama administration... Israel hit Syria last year for the same reason and Osirak in '81. Even INTERNATIONAL LAW recognizes this.
I can't help but imagine the look on NASA engineers faces when they have to talk to this moron.
What king has not dreamed of taxing the air? Just remember that the consumer ultimately pays all the suppliers costs... including the suppliers taxes.
Jus' sayin'
Given the 'quality' and 'objectivity' in the IPCC reports (and especially their emails!), is this the standard by which we should 'validate' the EPA proclamations?
Ludicrous.
I guess the next legal challenge needs to be against the IPCC and UN. Good luck.