Flashback: JunkScience predicts outcome of EPA ‘endangerment finding’ litigation

Written by Steve Milloy, Canada Free Press.

cartoon-epa-chicken-littleWe aren’t K St. lawyers bilking deep-pocketed clients at $500+ per hour — but we knew the endangerment finding litigation against the EPA was doomed from the start.

In our Dec. 28, 2010 posting “GOP all set to wimp out?“, we wrote:

… Moreover, while the portion of the EPA’s climate rules that is flagrantly illegal is likely to be overturned (i.e., the so-called “tailoring rule” under which EPA unilaterally amended the Clean Air Act to limit regulation of greenhouse gases from 100-ton emitters to 75,000-ton emitters), it is unlikely that the Court will overturn the EPA’s so-called “endangerment funding” (which declares that greenhouse gases are a threat to the public welfare).

Under the 1984 Supreme Court case Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, it is extremely difficult to show that an agency has acted arbitrarily and capriciously in violation of the Administrative Procedures Act

Following today’s DC Circuit Appellate Court hearing on the endangerment finding, the Wall Street Journal reported:

… During the first day of court hearings, members of a three-judge panel said they were required by law to give deference to the EPA’s finding that greenhouse-gas emissions were very likely responsible for most global warming over the last half-century, and were a threat to humans and the environment.

  To prevail, the industry challengers would have to show the EPA’s findings were arbitrary, capricious or an abuse of government discretion.

  “You seem to be asking us to determine that the EPA is incorrect, but that is not the standard,” Chief Judge David Sentelle told a lawyer for the challengers. Such a determination “would not be enough to win the case for you,” he said…

As we pointed out in “GOP all set to wimp out?,” Energy and Commerce Chairman Fred Upton and other Congressional GOP were entirely wrong to rely on litigation to save America from EPA greenhouse gas regulation.

Congressional GOP have had the power, but have failed to do anything to stop the Obama EPA since the 112th Congress commenced. Shame on them.

Source

Comments  

 
Gator
# Gator 02-29-2012 10:39
This is no longer a free nation. When bureaucrats are allowed to dictate law by decree, we have surrendered to yet another crown. The EPA is not required to prove any of its assertions before putting its boot on our collective neck.

We the people have lost our sovereignty.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
anne
# anne 02-29-2012 15:05
It makes me sick to the heart to see the USA come to this, what hope is there for democracy in the rest of the world, particularly in the far East. :-x
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
Gator
# Gator 02-29-2012 15:24
Hey anne! We all need to remember these words...

www.youtube.com/watch?v=yiO-RBHy6X0
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
anne
# anne 02-29-2012 15:43
www.statedepartmentwatch.org/GiveawaySummary.htm Hi Gator, I totally agree with those words. The content of the link really concerns me, particularly as Russia and China have not supported America and UK with respect to Iran, could this be a bribe? If so how ugly will things get?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
Gator
# Gator 02-29-2012 15:55
If we do not get rid of the bowing apologist-in-chief soon, things will get worse. I wish Reagan could come back from the grave, and b*tch slap Obama.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
Gator
# Gator 02-29-2012 15:56
Of course, if he could, all of the founders and past patriots would be anxiously lining up for their turn at humiliating this POS.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
anne
# anne 02-29-2012 15:49
www.davidicke.com/headlines/61927-global-warming-peer-review-deception- Hi again Gator, and I do like to regularly have a good laugh at the religious AGW zealots. Enjoy :D But then again it's not so funny anymore.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
anne
# anne 02-29-2012 15:56
www.prisonplanet.com/ethicists-argue-killing-newborn-babies-should-be-allowed.html Tell me if you become bored Gator, but I find it amazing that this can be published freely, if it was said about a polar bear or a tree the man would be a sitting duck.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
Gator
# Gator 02-29-2012 16:23
There should be a secret squad of 'cleansers', who in the dark of the night, find these animals and place them in an unmarked and shallow grave.

There is no place in human society for these monsters, and no words can describe this kind of mind boggling evil.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
anne
# anne 02-29-2012 15:59
www.naturalnews.com/035094_Patricia_Finn_vaccinations_health_freedom.html Gator, is this true? If so your nanny state is now bigger than ours, OMG
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
Gator
# Gator 02-29-2012 16:28
Hey anne! We have government officials in schools now, that monitor the food with which parents feed their kids. If the Food Nazis decides your brand of baloney is not up to snuff, they throw away your carefully and lovingly packed lunch, and then bill you for chicken nuggets scraps.

This is why we have the 2nd amendment.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
Robert
# Robert 02-29-2012 16:33
Well, the military won't support Obama. So it will be interesting to see how far things might go.

Those who enlist to do the minimum and get out may support him, especially those in "special interest" categories such as gays.

But the lifers, the career military types, they won't support him. He's already pissing them off by cutting their health benefits. What army would the politicians call upon to defend themselves if things really go wonky?

I don't know where things are going to go, but I expect it is going to get really damn ugly before it gets better.

This is the US military oath of enlistment:
Quote:
I, (NAME), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.
Notice that defending the Constitution comes before obeying the orders of the President.

Also notice it states "against all enemies foreign and domestic." What happens when the president becomes one of those enemies?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
Gator
# Gator 02-29-2012 17:28
Quoting Robert:
What happens when the president becomes one of those enemies?


Let me fix that for you.

What happens when the president becomes is one of those enemies?

That's better.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
Gator
# Gator 02-29-2012 17:49
Quote:
Despite the rebranding of NASA as ArabAir.
I'm telling my brother! After I finish laughing... :lol:
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
More Soylent Green!
# More Soylent Green! 02-29-2012 16:56
At this point, litigation is the only available recourse. The House can pass whatever it wants. Unless Harry Reid will bring it up for a vote in the Senate, it's just symbolic. Elect a new Senate in November and then try to pass the legislation.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
Red Jeff
# Red Jeff 02-29-2012 17:26
Obama must go. Here's why. His domestic policy, from an outsiders view, is a shambles. Obamacare may be, but forced birth control coverage is, unconstitutional (you can't force a business into a business agreement... courts won't allow it). The $1 TRILLION 'stimulus' package didn't stimulate... let's hope the $1/2 trillion idea fails only half as much. Skilled jobs in advanced fields are being stopped because of cronyism. Educated young are not paying into systems that depend on their tax payments because they're unemployed or underutilized. China has invested $15 billion in our oil sands in the last 3 years. Keystone will net $7.2 billion. Who do you think has who over a (-n oil) barrel here? At least selling and leasing rights will go SOME way to correcting the never ending American trade imbalance.

Which brings me to how Obama's America treats it's friends... Yeah, I really want China to get our resources over the States. We are old friends and allies, I would rather enrichen you than anyone else (Note: Ontario and east get their oil from the North Sea (Norway) and Algeria!!!) WE NEED PIPELINES TOO!!!

Obama handed over the serial numbers for all of Britain's Trident nuke missiles and stopped stationing anti-missile bases in Poland and the Czech Republic as demanded by Russia to continue START II negotiations.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
Red Jeff
# Red Jeff 02-29-2012 17:46
Obama has further alienated what little friends America has in the middle east. Mubarak at least favoured the West and now Obama must court the Muslim Brotherhood, oh they that assassinated Sadat and tried to kill Nassar. These lads have been at it a very long time... they've finally found their dupe in Obama. Arab Spring or Despot Fall, time will be the judge. Daffy Kadaffi was no pal of mine but he did renounce his nuclear program and terrorism. It got him a bullet. The next dictator won't so easily be persuaded by the West's words. Oil war? Note that NATO didn't hit the oil supply (unlike Saddam) and Italy and France have first dibs on Libyan oil. Probably just coincidence. America has gained NO friends while peeing of the rest. Where is Obama's payback of foreign speeches thanking America? Nowhere. Despite the rebranding of NASA as ArabAir.

I won't go into the litany of slight's the OBAMA regime has foisted on Israel but the latest is beyond acceptable... "(Reuters) - Defense Secretary Leon Panetta believes there is a growing possibility Israel will attack Iran as early as April to stop Tehran from building a nuclear bomb, U.S. media reported on Thursday." www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/03/us-nuclear-iran-usa-israel-idUSTRE81202Z20120203

Note to the a**wipe Obama administration... Israel hit Syria last year for the same reason and Osirak in '81. Even INTERNATIONAL LAW recognizes this.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
Gator
# Gator 02-29-2012 17:51
Quote:
Despite the rebranding of NASA as ArabAir.
I'm telling my brother! Right after I stop laughing... :lol:
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
Red Jeff
# Red Jeff 02-29-2012 19:25
Thought you'd like that one Gator! I was in full mind rant when it slipped out! Fit nicely within the sentence structure tho'!! :D

I can't help but imagine the look on NASA engineers faces when they have to talk to this moron.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
Red Jeff
# Red Jeff 02-29-2012 17:53
Obama was elected by a hydra of many heads. Those mouths have to be fed. Watch the debt ceiling to see it consume unsustainably.

What king has not dreamed of taxing the air? Just remember that the consumer ultimately pays all the suppliers costs... including the suppliers taxes.

Jus' sayin'
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
MAS-ttl
# MAS-ttl 02-29-2012 17:43
'Tis a fascinating standard that the court has outlined. So the EPA is given 'deference' and therefore assumed that their declarations on CO2 are correct, yet the EPA, which is NOT a scientific body and does no scientific research, cited the IPCC as their evidence. Say what?

Given the 'quality' and 'objectivity' in the IPCC reports (and especially their emails!), is this the standard by which we should 'validate' the EPA proclamations?

Ludicrous.

I guess the next legal challenge needs to be against the IPCC and UN. Good luck.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
anne
# anne 03-01-2012 03:15
www.davidicke.com/headlines/62049-west-regards-majority-of-syrians-as-non-people Everyone should see the real truth of what is happening in Syria.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 

Add comment

Before posting a comment, please read the Terms of Service (click here). Long links are shortened but still work.

PLEASE report all spam/inappropriate comments using the 'Report to administrator' link. If you find your post gone, it's because you violated the TOS.


Security code
Refresh