Climate scientists want ‘world government’ to enforce global warming policy
Climate Action Network press conference (Photo credit: Oxfam International)
What was once a hidden agenda has now become an open secret: as efforts to browbeat the public into believing in climate change fail, scientists are now openly calling for a new World Government to force people to make changes and accept new climate taxes.
The 2009 edition of my book Air Con was the first mainstream publication to directly link the climate change scare to globalisation and world government agendas, the specifics of which you can read a brief extract of in more detail here.
However, now increasingly-pressured climate scientists have broken cover and openly called for an authoritarian world government to be implemented to force climate change acceptance on the world’s population.
Where persuasion has failed because the evidence doesn’t stack up, the global forces hoping to make a financial killing from climate change laws have convinced their scientific sock-puppets to make a political case for global governance.
Add comment
Before posting a comment, please read the Terms of Service (click here). Long links are shortened but still work.
PLEASE report all spam/inappropriate comments using the 'Report to administrator' link. If you find your post gone, it's because you violated the TOS.
Comments
summary execution
of these so-called
self claiming "scientists"
is actually in fact
just as reasonable
as their demand
Not when they come up with crap like that.
Alex Jones, I'm looking at you.
He has operated for so long without being shutdown, it made me suspicious.
He is also a useful "lightning rod" - his deliberate presence is designed to attract people out of the woodwork so they can be easily tagged & bagged later.
Not only is global governance a growing reality, you can even get a Masters in it at a Canadian University.
htt://globalgovernance.uwaterloo.ca
Shooter, are you a Coincidence Theorist?
When this sickness permiates society, right minded and moral people will be labelled fools and brutalised.
Also, if you're quoting David Icke, a batshit insane conspiracy theorist, how are you anything BUT paranoid?
I'd rather be labelled paranoid by ignorant cannon fodder, than be in the class of of people who say "what happened?"
I find Alex J.'s info dead on and his guests worth listening to. I also find his energy excesses annoying.
www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/12-another-massacre-in-haiti-by-un-troops/
Are you really so dense to think countries would just sit by and say: "Oh yeah, we'll be part of one government! I mean, who needs profit?"
Jesus. I thought the skeptic community was smart, but it seems they're nothing but basement dwellers.
Pot meet kettle, seems you are behaving like the "basement dwellers" you are condemning.
Whether or not it is possible has nothing at all to do with whether or not some may try and accomplish it. People do strange things if they believe there is power, status, or money in it for them.
That guy believes in interdimensional Reptiles! How could you take him seriously?
Better get back to that basement!
nofrakkingconsensus.com/2012/03/19/fairy-tales-on-the-road-to-rio/
They are truly the anti-human league.
This one explains how a weather futures market could be manipulated by weather control technology.
foodfreedom.wordpress.com/2011/10/12/why-in-the-world-are-they-spraying/
They tested sludge, which already has natural aluminum in it. So their claims are moot. Conspiracy theorists are no different from warmists, and to suggest that people can control the weather makes you just as insane.
joannenova.com.au/2012/03/conspiracy-theorist-just-another-form-of-namecalling-from-the-class-who-want-to-be-global-rulers/
It starts out as so:
Quote:Something to think about.
You're confusing chemtrails with contrails. They have existed long before people have been flying.
This is incredible. Every time I try to find a good skeptic site, there's nothing but conspiracy theorists on it. I guess Alex Jones is your God.
Anne, if you really were a seeker of truth, you should know that "What in the World Are They Spraying?" is a complete scam. If it was happening, would people be SO dense to let it happen? Do you have any evidence, other than YouTube videos, that prove chemtrails exist?
There is no evidence. Next time, think for yourself instead of believing in conspiracy theories. There's a reason warmists don't take skeptics seriously: It's because they are nothing but conspiracy theorists!
Chemtrails are the oily boron-alu-insert_chemical_here mix that is dumped from aircraft.
Shooter yore full of it mate - go and be a troll somewhere else. The reason people have such opinion sis because after a ( usually ) exhaistive period of study and weighing up the evidence, it would appear quite simply that all this stuff exists.
Its the dim wits and ignorant who try and pretend it doesnt exist.
the core issue is that this is so massive, peopel cantcmplrehend it, which is why they dismiss it. I have seen square clouds from Scalar technology use, I have seen huge holes open up in clouds, I have seen the regular sine wave imposed on clouds so they burn off in the classic scalar "rib" pattern. I have seen storms change course on a dime and watched as the weathe radar "outs" scalar activity.
A lot of us have maths/science/engineering degrees on this site. Please never ever call us dumb or ill informed.
And if you don tlike it - leave.
You remind me of half-watt.
They would NOT do this in the open, because they themselves would be at risk! Also, since there's countless articles on the Internet, it totally means they're getting away with it, right? My God, are people so "gullible".
Really.
bariumblues.com
Ken Caldiera, astrophysicist at LLL, ocean acidification expert and geo-engineer told reporter William Thomas that Edward Teller thought it up as a way to prevent "global warming". I doubt that, since Teller signed the Oregon Petition before he died.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=UdtLTyNOB0A&feature=related
First confirmed by Airport Authority Terry Stewart at the Victoria International Airport on Dec. 8, 2000 as a 'joint Canada-U.S. military operation' and stridently denied by senior officers at Canadian Forces Base (where Stewart later told the Vancouver Courier he had received his information) - these multi-plane missions were verified in March, 2001 by the Air Traffic Control (ATC) manager for the northeastern seaboard of the United States.
In three taped interviews with this reporter and veteran radio journalist S.T. Brendt, our 'Deep Sky' source said that he had been ordered to divert incoming commercial flights away from USAF tankers spraying s substance that showed up on ATC radars as a 'haze'.
These radar returns are the signature of the fine aluminum particles found in laboratory tests of chemtrail-contaminated rain taken in Espanola, Ontario in the summer of 1999. The lab analysis found reflective quartz particles in the chemtrail fallout - and levels of aluminum FIVE TIMES higher than Ontario's maximum permissible health safety standards."
More:http://www.rense.com/general20/cc.htm
www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO409F.html
Academia has been whoring itself for years, and the US MIlitary via the DOE is the sugar daddy.
www.electricalpollution.com/smartmeters.html
We're fighting the battle here in British Columbia too.
electricsense.com/2431/smart-meter-shielding-tips/
Human beings; forever scheming and plotting behind the scenes! There always seem to be THOSE people who always think they know what is better for other people.
I think that these 'DIFFERENT' people pushing for world governance by way of using the laughable theory of anthropogenic global warming to achieve it - have serious emotional and psychological issues to resolve. I hope for them - it is sooner than later!
Steve - It is becoming ever more clear to me that you are living in "The Giggle Zone."
Well, I guess you'll soon find out.
You can be highly educated and have a strong faith, the two are not mutually exclusive.
Gut feel says events will turn and quickly. My suggestion would be if anyone has even a small shred of interest in Christinaity, to start checking out asap, as Gods word has answers that atheists and secular humanists just cant provide.
Can humanists and athiests tell you whats happening in the world and why right now? I can tell you that the patterns of what sgoing on right now do fit within biblical scripture which also means wew have a massive wear on thehorizon and the arrival of the antiochrist, who will be smooth talking but brutal and will use the UN as his throne.
Wise people know what fire is, and dont play with it.
My suggestion is to start investingating God and his Word now, while you still can.
"Where is the wise man? Where is the scribe? Where is the debater of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of the world?" ( 1 Corinthians 1:20 )
Caveat Emptor.
The match between scripture and what we see in the real world is pretty much like reading your Horoscope and feeling that its prediction is spot-on.
I put no stock in that stuff and have no urge to seek any answers other than those that I can gather on my own. Supreme dieties and devine intervention are not going to be helpful.
Besides, the only difficulties I see as pressing right now are those within our political leadership wherein it seems that no effort is being spared to bring this country to ruin as expeditiously as possible.
Mainstream Media questions Chemclouds Chemtrails after concerned citizens start
unslavedmedia.net/unslavedmedia/watch_video.php?v=783K48S59DNY
What wonderful news out of Australia
joannenova.com.au/2012/03/those-devastating-queensland-election-results-voters-hate-lies-and-the-carbon-tax/
An imaginary solution to an imaginary problem.
In many ways, I am ignorant of so much and I see no point whatsoever in pretending to have any meaningful answers to anything.
I once heard a quote many years ago which has stuck with me for some time. I am not sure who said it to be honest, but I can understand it's relevance to so many issues in the modern world. It states that 'we do not see things as they are; we see them as we are'. Perhaps, there is some degree of truth to this statement or opinion - whichever way to choose to look at it!!
I would strongly argue, however, that the issue of human-induced climate change needs to be openly challenged. I am sufficiently aware of the fact that the climate system is an immensely complex object and there are many aspects of it IN PLAY and others not sufficiently well understood (e.g. cosmic rays and low -level cloud formation) to arrive at the sort of conclusions that are being derived from computer models.
It seems to me that unless we have perfect knowledge of how all of the earth's systems operate combined with a perfect knowledge of solar influences and the precise degree to which they affect our planet in both magnitude and scale - then any type of conclusion based upon an incomplete understanding base - should not be relied upon with any degree of emphasis.
They have zero skill at predicting climate. After tweeking they can be made to replicate past events but cannot make accurate skillfull predictions. IE Validation. If they could it would make headlines.
Untill they can, they can and are being safely ignored by the general public.
exhttp://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=solar%20radiation%20management%20global%20governance%20april%202012&source=web&cd=7&sqi=2&ved=0CHEQtwIwBg&url=http%3A%2F%2Fvimeo.com%2F30192030&ei=apmPT8u2EcWq8QPHxNXIBA&usg=AFQjCNEGb3i7lDz5wUBV6tu02cqykR2Pbgists