Once-derided climate-change satellite may launch with new goal

Written by Mark K. Matthews, Boston Herald.

Image of Earth from Galileo spacecraft

Image of Earth from Galileo spacecraft (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

An Earth observation satellite conceived by former Vice President Al Gore — but banished to a Maryland warehouse by foes of climate change after George W. Bush beat Gore for the presidency — could get a ride into space as early as 2014.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration wants about $23 million next year to continue a quiet reboot of the satellite, and spending bills circulating in Congress show that lawmakers — so far — are willing go along with it.

But given the satellite’s history, supporters won’t breathe easy until the Deep Space Climate Observatory rises from a launchpad.

"It’s been a long road," said Francisco Valero, the project’s principal investigator.

The probe’s tale begins in 1998 at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where Gore outlined the concept for a NASA satellite that could continuously monitor Earth — and beam back pictures 24-7 — from an orbit 1 million miles away. He named it "Triana," after Rodrigo de Triana, the sailor in Christopher Columbus’ crew who first spied the New World.

The reason for the million-mile orbit was twofold.

The satellite’s instruments could make large-scale observations about global climate change — a vast improvement over the narrow segments of the planet provided by closer-in satellites.

"It’s like looking at the forest and looking at every tree simultaneously," Valero said.

But as important to Gore — who after he lost the presidency made the Oscar-winning documentary "An Inconvenient Truth" about climate change — the satellite would offer environmentalists a live view of the planet similar to the iconic "Blue Marble" photo of Earth taken during the Apollo era.

"This new satellite ... will allow people around the globe to gaze at our planet as it travels in its orbit around the sun for the first time in history," said Gore at the time. He added that the probe could "awaken a new generation to the environment."

On those orders, NASA spent about $100 million on the satellite — only to see its launch delayed and ultimately canceled after Republican leaders in Congress raised questions about its cost and scientific worth.

Among them was former U.S. Rep. Dave Weldon, R-Fla., who said the so-called "GoreSat" was nothing more than an expensive "screensaver" and dismissed its possible contributions to climate-change science.

Now running for U.S. Senate, Weldon reiterated his concerns.

"It was a pet project of Al Gore’s," he said. "I think it’s still questionable."

After Bush’s election in 2000, the satellite was consigned to storage at a Maryland warehouse. But in 2008, NOAA and the Air Force moved to rescue it for a mission that had nothing to do with climate change or inspiring pictures.

One of the instruments aboard the satellite was a sensor that can monitor disturbances in solar weather, including flare-ups that have the potential to wreak havoc on global communications.

Read rest…

Comments  

 
Gator
# Gator 07-10-2012 11:37
"We want to obtain data that allows the scientific world to come up with a definitive answer to (the question of) global warming," said Valero, of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography. "We want to prove it with data so there is more discussion about it."

This is exactly what scares me most about government sponsored 'science'.

No more discussion?

Really?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
amirlach
# amirlach 07-10-2012 20:21
If they havn't been using "Data" to "Prove it". What the hell have they been using? Tea Leaves? Chicken Entrails?... Wait what? Models? :D
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
Gator
# Gator 07-10-2012 20:31
Are you saying there is a problem with the models? ;-)

www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJfx0d-mmIo
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
Boxorox
# Boxorox 07-11-2012 14:23
I actually hope to have a space-based view of Earth on a continuing basis. This, in view of the fact, that years stream by and my chances of going into earth orbit are becoming ever less likely.

For that reason I say let loose the Gorebot satellite. However, in view of its sponsor and the intent of its designers, I do hold huge suspicions that any data it returns will be filtered and convoluted to "prove" the conclusions that have already been drawn about humanity's damage to the planet.

We know that's coming anyway. Put the $100 billion to use and launch the dang thing. We'll deal with the propaganda it generates.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 

Add comment

Before posting a comment, please read the Terms of Service (click here). Long links are shortened but still work.

PLEASE report all spam/inappropriate comments using the 'Report to administrator' link. If you find your post gone, it's because you violated the TOS.


Security code
Refresh