Do greenhouse gases warm the planet by 33°C? Jinan Cao checks the numbers

Written by JoNova.

This is the official IPCC version of the Earths Energy Budget as shown in the IPCC AR4 in 2007.[h/t to John] Jinan Cao has been dissecting the nature of the greenhouse effect and a key calculation that I normally just accept without questioning. This will set a few pigeons loose, but it will be interesting to see where they land. The claims analyzed here are the oft repeated ones that the Earth’s greenhouse effect already warms us by 33°C and that a doubling of CO2 directly causes a 1.1°C rise (that’s with no feedbacks taken into account).

Jinan points out that these numbers, repeated as “fact”, are merely a result of misuse of the Stefan-Boltzmann equation. If Earth is not a perfect black body, but has an emissivity of 0.7 (as satellites suggest), then the temperature of the planet’s surface without any greenhouse effect would not be -18°C, but more like 5°C. That would mean the entire warming due to the greenhouse effect is only around 10°C, not the more impressive 33°C that is usually claimed. It means the greenhouse effect is probably less important than implied.

The 1.1°C direct rise that is predicted from doubling CO2 without feedbacks would also need to be recalculated. This paper does not try to do that, but if Jinan is right, that figure would be significantly lower too. Jinan looks at how that figure was derived. David Evans has been helping review Jinan’s work and writes the introduction below.  –  Jo

Read article

Comments  

 
AIDO
# AIDO 09-11-2012 11:34
Read article - said I didn't have authority to access this server. What gives?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
Me
# Me 09-11-2012 12:26
Watermellon hackers attacking her site again, it has happened before.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
Gator
# Gator 09-11-2012 18:39
"Today’s climate scientists will attempt to laugh off these criticisms by saying that their models are much more sophisticated and accurate than the crude 0-D models considered when applying the SB equation."

Those who study modeling will tell you that when it comes to modeling chaotic systems, very often the more complexity that is added to the model, the less reliable results. But you cannot tell that to a 'climate expert'.

"But, but, but the models..."

I have always maintained that the warming effect CO2 has on our climate has been wildly exaggerated. It is truly amazing how few questions the left asks about their own data and assumptions, so long as they fit the leftist agenda. The National Socialist Party would be proud.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 

Add comment

Before posting a comment, please read the Terms of Service (click here). Long links are shortened but still work.

PLEASE report all spam/inappropriate comments using the 'Report to administrator' link. If you find your post gone, it's because you violated the TOS.


Security code
Refresh