Global Warming Alarmists Seek More Power, Not Emissions Reductions

Written by James Taylor, Forbes blogs.

co2emissionsAs U.S. carbon dioxide emissions continue to decline, one would think global warming alarmists would celebrate the ongoing achievement. Instead, alarmists are ramping up their vitriol. The alarmists’ increasing vitriol reveals that for many alarmists, the true goal is not a reduction in carbon dioxide emissions, but instead a transfer of wealth and power from individuals to government.

The U.S. Energy Information Administration reports that U.S. carbon dioxide emissions during the first quarter of 2012 were the lowest since 1992. With more and more U.S. power plants switching from coal to natural gas, the decline is likely to continue and the reductions are likely to be permanent.

The decline in U.S. carbon dioxide emissions is striking when we compare U.S. emission trends to global emission trends.

In 2000, U.S. emissions totaled 5.9 billion metric tons, while global emissions totaled 23.7 billion metric tons. Accordingly, in 2000 the United States accounted for 25 percent of global carbon dioxide emissions.

By 2010, however, U.S. emissions fell to 5.6 billion metric tons, while global emissions rose to 31.8 billion metric tons. Accordingly, in 2010 the United States accounted for merely 18 percent of global carbon dioxide emissions.

If the U.S. emissions reductions in early 2012 hold throughout the year, they’ll likely fall to merely 15 percent of the global total.

By the end of the decade, U.S. emissions will most likely decline to approximately 12 percent of global emissions, or less than half the U.S. share in 2000.

Keeping in mind that the United States produces 23 percent of the world’s Gross Domestic Product , reducing U.S. emissions to 12-to-15 percent of the global total is quite impressive.

These reductions in U.S. carbon dioxide emissions are taking place without all-intrusive, economy-wide, government-imposed restrictions. Yes, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency regulations that economically punish coal power plants are somewhat responsible for the shift to natural gas power, but so too are technological advances and new natural gas discoveries that have dramatically reduced the price of natural gas.

If the alarmists’ true goal is significantly reducing carbon dioxide emissions, they would acknowledge and celebrate these ongoing reductions. Instead, however, alarmists are doubling down on vitriol and hateful rhetoric.

Read rest…

Comments  

 
klem
# klem 09-12-2012 19:23
Alarmists don't actually want reduced CO2 emissions. If we reduced CO2 emissions to zero they'd still complain. Its ideology.

Greenies are like a bunch of old wives complaing about their husbands. Its endless.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
amirlach
# amirlach 09-12-2012 19:42
Your right. The IPCC's fearless leader said it's not about reducing Co2. "But one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world's wealth by climate policy.” Ottmar Edenhofer.

Edenhofer was co-chair of the IPCC's Working Group III, and was a lead author of the IPCC's Fourth Assessment Report released in 2007

Last time a german had a master plan it didn't turn out so good...
And BTW i know first hand because my great uncles, on my fathers side drove Tanks in Hitlers Ranks.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
Mark
# Mark 09-13-2012 06:19
If we reduced C02 below a certain point we could wipe off all living creatures - maybe that would be what the Earth worshippers want.

C02 is plant food. Found in fizzy drinks and we breathe it out all day long without any adverse affects.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
AIDO
# AIDO 09-13-2012 05:54
Pace james Delingpole's Watermelons: these people are green on the outside and red on the inside
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
Mark
# Mark 09-13-2012 06:10
Or maybe just mouldy tomatoes :lol:
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
Gator
# Gator 09-13-2012 15:10
Hey Mark! You may be onto something. They say moss does not grow on a rolling stone, and I would venture to say that these 'tomatoes' have not budged one bit in decades. They are still stuck on stupid, blaming CO2, and getting moldier by the day. :-x
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 

Add comment

Before posting a comment, please read the Terms of Service (click here). Long links are shortened but still work.

PLEASE report all spam/inappropriate comments using the 'Report to administrator' link. If you find your post gone, it's because you violated the TOS.


Security code
Refresh