[h/t to John] In a completely unreferenced guest post by a Lloyd Robertson on Bishop Hill we read:
"Of course I am a skeptic, and I am giving the impression that the egregious faults are all on the other side. I suppose the skydragons, whoever they are, are plain ignorant, not trying to learn, but probably honest. I don't read them, I had never even heard of them until Judy Curry sharpened her lance against them."
The idea of judging someone whom you know nothing about is very adolescent and as ignorant and unscientific as any of those he criticizes. If he has any self-respect and intellectual integrity the ecclesiastical one should take this bit of foolishness down.
The article claims to be a taxonomy but the first step for a taxonomy is to be very familiar with the subject matter.
For reference I am not myself one of the "skydragons". Background on the "skydragons" here
See related article