Studies find Alberta oil sands development not a major source of long-distance air and water pollution

Written by Waterloo News.

Athabasca oil sands digger

Oil sands digger (Photo credit: . Shell)

[h/t to Andrew] Oil sands development in northern Alberta isn’t polluting the nearby Peace-Athabasca Delta via the air and water to the extent many may believe, two recently published University of Waterloo research studies have found.

The research revealed that Alberta oil sands emissions haven’t increased the amount of metal and organic contaminants travelling via the atmosphere to the delta, located 200 km north of the oil sands industry. And it determined that oil sands mining activity hasn’t measurably increased the delivery of organic contaminants to shallow delta lakes via the Athabasca River.

The findings by researchers at the University of Waterloo and Wilfrid Laurier University counter the belief that human health, wildlife, and ecosystems are suffering as a result of long-distance transport of contaminants from the oil sands development.

“This evidence is essential in guiding responsible development of the oil sands while recognizing its true impact and benefits,” says Terry McMahon, dean of science. “It demonstrates the value that comprehensive research and the generation of knowledge can have on future decisions that affect our health, economy, and environment.”

One of the studies, “Has Alberta oil sands development altered delivery of polycyclic aromatic compounds to the Peace-Athabasca Delta? published on September 26 in PLOS ONE, discovered the amount of organic contaminants that the Athabasca River carried to the downstream delta hasn’t increased above pre-development levels in sediments of a flood-prone lake.

Earlier in September, the study “Has Alberta oil sands development increased far-field delivery of airborne contaminants to the Peace-Athabasca Delta?”examining the transport of metal contaminants from the oil sands by air was published in Science of the Total Environment. It shows that key metals of concern including lead, antimony, arsenic, and mercury declined during the period when Alberta oil sands production was increasing dramatically. For these studies, researchers used lake sediment records spanning the past 200 years to provide critical knowledge of baseline, pre-development levels of metal and organic contaminant deposition, and to measure changes over time since the onset of oil sands development.

“The results of this study are significant in providing the knowledge needed for meaningful debates about the environmental exposure and effects of oil production at the world’s second-largest proven reserve,” says Roland Hall, principal investigator on the study and professor in the Department of Biology. “Indeed, our data show that toxic metals like arsenic and lead travelling via the atmosphere have declined dramatically in recent decades despite the growth of Alberta’s oil sands industry. And, we were unable to detect an increase in organic contaminants transported by the Athabasca River above natural levels delivered by floodwaters.”

The study may provide a foundation to map the footprint of emissions travelling via the air and water from oil sands operations over space and time, which could be a valuable contribution to Environment Canada’s new oil sands monitoring program.

Source

Comments  

 
Gator
# Gator 10-16-2012 12:22
Why do we not hear any shouts of joy from the greens? Is this not good news for the environment? Could it be that they hate progress more than they love the Earth? That they love being sh*t disturbers more than being tree huggers?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
amirlach
# amirlach 10-16-2012 19:50
The "Greens" wouldn't fund this study, nor would the government. Quite likely because they already knew what the data would show. Quote:
Finding funding for the study was actually the hardest part. A federal funding review committee told Hall to find money within the energy industry since the research related to it. Suncor eventually sponsored the study. Ironically, that has raised the ire of environmental groups crying foul and suggesting bias.
www.edmontonsun.com/2012/10/10/oilsands-impact-overstated-university-of-waterloo-study-shows
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
Red Jeff
# Red Jeff 10-16-2012 20:20
Canadians overwhelmingly support the ethical oil sands to boot! www.sunnewsnetwork.ca/video/search/all/defending-canadian-oil/1903793815001

This is something that you won't hear in the liberal press. Even in Quebec 2/3 are in favour! cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Canada/2012/10/15/20284481.html?cid=rssnewscanada
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 

Add comment

Before posting a comment, please read the Terms of Service (click here). Long links are shortened but still work.

PLEASE report all spam/inappropriate comments using the 'Report to administrator' link. If you find your post gone, it's because you violated the TOS.


Security code
Refresh