Reid says Hurricane Katrina was 'nothing in comparison' to Sandy
Hurricane Katrina near its peak Category 5 intensity (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
[h/t to amirlach] Comparing disasters is probably never a good idea because regardless of the size it's a travesty for those directly affected. Therefore, it was surprising, as well as factually incorrect, when Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid Friday took to the Senate floor and declared that Hurricane Katrina was "nothing in comparison to what happened to the people in New York and New Jersey" from Hurricane Sandy.
Sandy devastated some of the nation's most populated areas, but it didn't come close to Katrina. Hurricane Katrina, and the flooding that followed when federally built levees failed, killing 1,833 and causing more than $145 billion in damage. Sandy has been blamed for 120 deaths and over $80 billion in damage.

Add comment
Before posting a comment, please read the Terms of Service (click here). Long links are shortened but still work.
PLEASE report all spam/inappropriate comments using the 'Report to administrator' link. If you find your post gone, it's because you violated the TOS.

Comments
Of the names I could find, many were traffic accidents, heart attacks, falls, fights, etc...
For an honest perspective on Katrina, one should review this piece... maybe email it to Joe the Dumber.
www.popularmechanics.com/science/environment/natural-disasters/2315076
There was much exaggeration (remember the 'rapes' in the 'Dome - nevah happened) then the lame-stream mejia realised Dimocrats would be blamed, then, for a brief period they told (approx) the truth. Then the Bushitler thing started ......
the current demogogue of
the us senate
harry reid is nothing
in comparison to
any senate leader
who preceded him