Meanwhile, Hansen and Karl go on about certainty
NASA Scientist James Hansen Arrested (Wikipedia)
There’s a press conference going on right now with NCDC’s Tom Karl and NASA GISS Dr. James Hansen. They want us to believe them, about the certainty of their conclusions from data. I just checked the “State of the Climate Report” being referred to, and one has to wonder, when they are this sloppy with important details, can we really trust their conclusions derived from details? I had to laugh when I saw this in the SOTC for 2012:
You’d think they could get a simple detail like a date/time stamp on the official reports right. The “downloaded” time is the time my browser accessed it. The updated time is over a year ago, for a report made this month.
See for yourself here: http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/
Scroll all the way to the bottom.
You have to wonder, like the warden in the Shawshank Redemption, are they being purposely obtuse?
Date/time stamps are crucial in science. Flubs like that would be enough to get most forensic science tossed out of court if they can’t establish the point in time exactly. It is a small detail to some, and a major detail to others. The devil is in the details, and if you want to convince people that your conclusions are accurate, pay attention to the details. Science is all about the details.
Add comment
Before posting a comment, please read the Terms of Service (click here). Long links are shortened but still work.
PLEASE report all spam/inappropriate comments using the 'Report to administrator' link. If you find your post gone, it's because you violated the TOS.
Comments
Allowing bad behavior only begets more and worse undesirable behaviors.
Feb. 17 will be Look Up Wake Up day in Canada to try to bring to public awareness the ongoing geoengineering program that clouds our skies.
Participating cities are Vancouver, Toronto, Ottawa, Hamilton and Halifax with more on the way!
www.canadaskywatch.com/articles/events/2013/02_17_lookup_wakeup_stop_chemtrails.html
I live in Vancouver BC, and quite often watch the chem trails as they are being created. If people would, indeed, only just look up!
The usual official response is, typically, they're just "contrails". What crap, I know what contrails look like! If I had unlimited resources (i.e. money) I would proceed as follows:
1)Hire an aircraft equipped with a means to collect a sample, then have it fly through one of the chem trails.
2)Take the sample to an independent lab. and have it analyzed.
3)If the sample is found to contain aluminum, barium, or any other such suspicious chemicals, get a lawyer.
4)Present the evidence to the supreme court with the intent of suing the government.
I don't what else one could do. The problem with awareness rallies, or even my proposed approach, is that there would likely be no media coverage since they would in on the coverup.
"On November 18, 1999, the people of Espanola, Ontario petitioned Parliament. Addressing the Canadian government on their behalf, NDP Defence Critic Gordon Earle explained: "Over 500 residents of the Espanola area have signed a petition raising concern over possible government involvement in what appears to be aircraft emitting visible aerosols. They have found high traces of aluminum and quartz in particulate and rainwater samples." These concerns, combined with associated respiratory ailments, have led these Canadians to take action and seek clear answers from this government. The petitioners call upon Parliament to repeal any law that would permit the dispersal of military chaff or of any cloud-seeding substance whatsoever by domestic or foreign military aircraft without the informed consent of the citizens of Canada thus affected."
The Ministry of Defence eventually replied, denying their involvement in any spraying program over Espanola "
www.holmestead.ca/chemtrails/completehealth.html
Feb. 17 is about waking up the average citizen. We already have all the proof we need that the program exists. Now it is time to organize.
www.meetup.com/Chemtrails-Vancouver/