My argument in a picture so even Emerson understands

Written by Andrew Bolt, Herald Sun blogs.

Craig EmersonTrade Minister Craig Emerson on our 2GB show this week again tried to deny there had been a 16-year pause in global warming.

His argument was bizarre - that there cannot have been such a pause because the average temperature of the past decade was higher than of the decade before.

I was cross with myself for not being able to make Emerson understand the fallacy of that argument. I used an analogy - that my 18-year-old son stopped growing a year or two ago, but his average height over the past couple of years is still greater than his average height before then.

But Emerson refused to understand the point.

Forensic accountant Terry was equally frustrated with the mathematical ineptitude of a senior minister of the government which gave us a carbon tax on the assumption the world was warming fast.

So Terry has produced a graphic which surely even Emerson can understand:

image

As I tried to tell Emerson, to say the past decade was warmer than the one before is true - but still does not contradict the fact that for 16 years there has been no warming of any statistical significance.

Now, finally, will Emerson retract and apologise?

Source

Comments  

 
Streetcred
# Streetcred 02-15-2013 03:10
Let's be perfectly clear, Emerson is a certified idiot. His Phd (Economics)should be recalled for re-examination ... no 'educated' person can be this dumb.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
Gator
# Gator 02-14-2013 14:47
Leftists never apologize, and never admit they are wrong. The ends justify the means for them, so if ruining their own credibility is what it takes, so be it.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
Robert
# Robert 02-14-2013 22:50
Don't forget to include that:

a - it is always someone else's fault

b - it wasn't a bad idea it just needed more time (regardless of how much has passed and how many times it has failed in the past)

c - even though "the ends justify the means" their "means" always wind up achieving some other "ends" than what they advertised or thought they were after

and my favorite one due to the fact that I hear this regularly from a co-worker:

"I've discovered I am my brother's keeper" without ever once considering whether or not his/her brother wants to be kept by him/her (or anyone else) or that said brother will agree that what he/she thinks is best for him really is.

Not like they give a damn, it's not about helping anyone it's about making themselves feel better.

In the end it is always about them no matter how much they yammer on about how it's for everyone else.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
amirlach
# amirlach 02-15-2013 19:30
How Leftists Revise the Political Spectrum

www.youtube.com/watch?v=LsVXqGX_Vx8&feature=em-subs_digest
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 

Add comment

Newest comments at top. Before posting a comment, please read the Terms of Service (click here). Long links are shortened but still work.

PLEASE report all spam/inappropriate comments using the 'Report to administrator' link. If you find your post gone, it's because you violated the TOS.


Security code
Refresh