Retired NASA Scientists Enter Climate Change Fray
Dr. Harold DoironA group of retirees from NASA who once put a man on the moon and call their group The Right Climate Stuff “shouldn’t be taken seriously” according to an article in The Guardian, a British newspaper.
One of the most vocal of the bunch, Harold Doiron, was taunted at a debate held at the National Press Club in Washington DC this past January.
…snip…
“It is a volunteer group. I think we’re very objective. We don’t belong to any special interest group.” Dorion added, “Our conclusion is humans are not (causing) a significant warming of this planet.” (Watch the full discussion here)
Back home in Pearland, not far from Johnson Space Center where he once worked, Doiron told StateImpact why he and 20 or of his other colleagues decided to get involved in the highly political, highly contentious climate change issue.
“Well, the thing that really pushed me over the edge was the public statements of NASA’s chief climate scientist Dr. James Hansen,” Doiron said. Hansen has been outspoken on climate change, most recently voicing opposition to the Keystone XL pipeline because he said its heavy crude oil could increase greenhouse gases.
…snip…
“So we validated the model before we used it for any design decisions. And the current climate models are not validated,” Doiron said. “I don’t think we’re using anything close to a rational process to deal with this concern about global warming. The politicans, at least those in leadership, are acting like it’s a proven thing, that (carbon dioxide) is causing global warming, but it’s not been scientifically proved.”

Add comment
Before posting a comment, please read the Terms of Service (click here). Long links are shortened but still work.
PLEASE report all spam/inappropriate comments using the 'Report to administrator' link. If you find your post gone, it's because you violated the TOS.

Comments
Once again, you can only be an expert if you agree with AGW.
They obviously have no idea how childish this makes alarmists look. Just one big ole "NUH-UH!" is all they have.
It's time for a time out.
They wouldn't look nearly as bad were they to simply claim "well they aren't experts." It is very similar to their "well they aren't climate scientists" yammering even though the person was an acknowledged expert in statistics for example and what was being critiqued by that individual was the use or misuse of statistics.
we could just as easily say "we have seen many examples of warmists relying on fake journalists for their news..."
A bit closer to the truth though I personally would phrase it as "we have seen many who base their belief in this nonsense on reports and stories from incompetent journalists."
www.youtube.com/watch?v=hcucGn_X8AA
This is why the Scientific Method matters.