Retired NASA Scientists Enter Climate Change Fray

Written by Dave Fehling, StateImpact Texas.

Dr. Harold DoironDr. Harold DoironA group of retirees from NASA who once put a man on the moon and call their group The Right Climate Stuff “shouldn’t be taken seriously” according to an article in The Guardian, a British newspaper.

One of the most vocal of the bunch, Harold Doiron, was taunted at a debate held at the National Press Club in Washington DC this past January.

…snip…

“It is a volunteer group. I think we’re very objective. We don’t belong to any special interest group.” Dorion added, “Our conclusion is humans are not (causing) a significant warming of this planet.” (Watch the full discussion here)

Back home in Pearland, not far from Johnson Space Center where he once worked, Doiron told StateImpact why he and 20 or of his other colleagues decided to get involved in the highly political, highly contentious climate change issue.

“Well, the thing that really pushed me over the edge was the public statements of NASA’s chief climate scientist Dr. James Hansen,” Doiron said. Hansen has been outspoken on climate change, most recently voicing opposition to the Keystone XL pipeline because he said its heavy crude oil  could increase greenhouse gases.

…snip…

“So we validated the model before we used it for any design decisions. And the current climate models are not validated,” Doiron said. “I don’t think we’re using anything close to a rational process to deal with this concern about global warming.  The politicans, at least those in leadership, are acting like it’s a proven thing, that (carbon dioxide) is causing global warming, but it’s not been scientifically proved.”

Full article

Comments  

 
Gator
# Gator 03-12-2013 11:27
"We have seen many examples of climate denialists producing long lists of fake experts, for example the Oregon Petition and the Wall Street Journal 16. Now we have yet another of these lists of fake experts. 49 former National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) employees..."

Once again, you can only be an expert if you agree with AGW. :zzz

They obviously have no idea how childish this makes alarmists look. Just one big ole "NUH-UH!" is all they have.

It's time for a time out.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
Robert
# Robert 03-12-2013 14:04
Now Gator, they didn't say they weren't experts, they said they were FAKE experts.

They wouldn't look nearly as bad were they to simply claim "well they aren't experts." It is very similar to their "well they aren't climate scientists" yammering even though the person was an acknowledged expert in statistics for example and what was being critiqued by that individual was the use or misuse of statistics.

we could just as easily say "we have seen many examples of warmists relying on fake journalists for their news..."

A bit closer to the truth though I personally would phrase it as "we have seen many who base their belief in this nonsense on reports and stories from incompetent journalists."
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
Gator
# Gator 03-12-2013 14:20
Hey Robert! Apparently this is a video the left has yet to see...

www.youtube.com/watch?v=hcucGn_X8AA

This is why the Scientific Method matters.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 

Add comment

Before posting a comment, please read the Terms of Service (click here). Long links are shortened but still work.

PLEASE report all spam/inappropriate comments using the 'Report to administrator' link. If you find your post gone, it's because you violated the TOS.


Security code
Refresh