Hot, hot, hot? Not, not, not! Another flawed global warming study

Written by Tribune-Review Editorial.

Marine Fossils

Marine Fossils (Photo credit: JelleS)

Like “scientists” manipulating data to fit preordained conclusions, The New York Times and other mainstream media hyped a new study's climate-clucking claims while ignoring its methodology's fatal flaws.

“Global Temperatures Highest in 4,000 Years” read The Times' headline. The Times asserted that the study “confirms” warming during “the past century, believed to be a consequence of human activity, exceeded any warming episode during (the last 1,500 years).”

Yet the study, published in Science, purports to reconstruct 11,300 years' worth of temperatures, based on mostly marine fossils from 73 sites — which raises huge red flags.

Steve Milloy of JunkScience.com tweeted: “A study based on ‘reconstructed data' from 73 data sites, pretended to cover space-time of 196 million sq. mi. and 11,300 yrs” — and added in a blog post that it says “fossilized ocean shells are thermometers. Right-o.”

Read rest…

Comments  

 
Gator
# Gator 03-18-2013 13:55
I have to chuckle when I hear these frauds trying to explain why they chose the data and methods employed, even though it is insulting to my intelligence. It's just that they are so childish and so transparent, that I do find myself laughing, as I do at a kid who proclaims his innocence while extracting his hand from the cookie jar.

And just like in nature, the dumbest of the herd will make the most noise.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 

Add comment

Before posting a comment, please read the Terms of Service (click here). Long links are shortened but still work.

PLEASE report all spam/inappropriate comments using the 'Report to administrator' link. If you find your post gone, it's because you violated the TOS.


Security code
Refresh