New Zealand Climate Scientists Admit To Faking Temperatures: The Actual Temps Show Little Warming Over Last 50 Years
Read here and here. Climate "scientists" across the world have been blatantly fabricating temperatures in hopes of convincing the public and politicians that modern global warming is unprecedented and accelerating.
The scientists doing the fabrication are usually employed by the government agencies or universities, which thrive and exist on taxpayer research dollars dedicated to global warming research. A classic example of this is the New Zealand climate agency, which is now admitting their scientists produced bogus "warming" temperatures for New Zealand.
"NIWA makes the huge admission that New Zealand has experienced hardly any warming during the last half-century. For all their talk about warming, for all their rushed invention of the “Eleven-Station Series” to prove warming, this new series shows that no warming has occurred here since about 1960. Almost all the warming took place from 1940-60, when the IPCC says that the effect of CO2 concentrations was trivial. Indeed, global temperatures were falling during that period.....Almost all of the 34 adjustments made by Dr Jim Salinger to the 7SS have been abandoned, along with his version of the comparative station methodology."
A collection of temperature-fabrication charts.
Add comment
Before posting a comment, please read the Terms of Service (click here). Long links are shortened but still work.
PLEASE report all spam/inappropriate comments using the 'Report to administrator' link. If you find your post gone, it's because you violated the TOS.
Comments
www.niwa.co.nz/news-and-publications/news/all/7-station-series-review
“I am not surprised that this internationally peer reviewed 2010 report of the seven station temperature series has confirmed that NIWA’s science was sound. It adds to the scientific knowledge that shows that New Zealand’s temperature has risen by about 0.9 degrees over the past 100 years” Mr Morgan said.
Dec 17, 2010
Where exactly do you think you're posting now??
Denier group?
It is clearly obvious that the NCDC, GISS, and CRU take the raw data and, in the name of "adjusting" (for the urban heat island effect, probably), ADD temperature, rather than subtract some. Furthermore, they find totally unfounded and specious reasons to go into the archived data and make the first half of the 1900s colder so that recent years look warmer. [These adjustments are just simply cheating.]
These are dishonest "adjustments" of data which clearly does not show warming, in some cases, for 50 years and in most cases for the last 15 years. The raw data also clearly and always shows that the 1930s were significantly warmer than our recent warm period.
The people making these false "adjustments" are not scientists, but scam artists performing illegal acts which result in policy decisions which kill. The biofuels initiative has killed many thousands so far by significantly raising the cost of grains and food in general such that people in poor countries cannot afford to buy food. This is criminal, particularly as biofuels have a bigger "carbon footprint" than oil.
MInimize the sources all you want, we know that the data has been adulterated and it is easy to prove, and has been proven in many instances, even New Zealand 2 years ago.
Climate Science Coalition Vindicated
NIWA has abandoned the official national temperature record and created a new one following sustained pressure from the NZ Climate Science Coalition and the Climate Conversation Group.
www.scoop.co.nz/stories/SC1012/S00054/climate-science-coalition-vindicated.htm
Read the NIWA web site to see what they about about their data and how it is interpreted.
NIWA loses, opts for fresh start
www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/02/niwa-loses-opts-for-fresh-start/
The Raw Data:
www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/pics/nz-temp-raw-500.jpg
NIWA Adjusted data:
www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/pics/nz-temp-niwa-500.jpg
However, the so called "peer review" does not even seem to be completed so NIWA's claimed vindication looks premature. For example the error/reliability hasn't been reported yet. I expect some more surprises before this story ends.