Greenhouse Gas Theory Trashed in Groundbreaking Lab Experiment
|
July 18 2011
Greenhouse gas theory of global warming is refuted in momentous Mexican lab experiment. Results mean epic fail for doomsaying cult and climate taxes.
Professor Nasif Nahle of Monterrey, Mexico, backed by a team of international scientists, has faithfully recreated a famous experiment from 1909 to confirm that the greenhouse effect cannot cause global warming..
Astonishingly, the 1909 greenhouse gas experiment first performed by Professor Robert W. Wood at John Hopkins University hadn’t been replicated for a century. This despite over $100 billion spent by the man-made global warming industry trying to prove its case that carbon dioxide is a dangerous atmospheric pollutant.
The analogy had been that greenhouse gases (e.g. CO2) act like the glass in a greenhouse trapping heat in Earth’s atmosphere and if they build up (due to human industrial emissions) the planet would dangerously overheat.
Nahle Nails Shut Climate Scare Coffin
At the Biology Cabinet laboratories Professor Nahle was able to confirm the astounding findings: Wood was right all along. After peer-review the results confirm that the so-called ‘greenhouse effect’ is solely due to the blockage of convective heat transfer within the environment in which it is contained i.e. as in this case, a lab flask.
Indeed, it is the glass of the lab flask (or ‘greenhouse’) that caused the “trapped” radiation all along. The flask (or greenhouse) being what scientists refer to as a ‘closed system’; while Earth’s atmosphere isn’t closed at all but rather open to space allowing heat energy to freely escape.
Read rest here.
Add comment
Before posting a comment, please read the Terms of Service (click here). Long links are shortened but still work. Emails not shown.
Use your Gravatar username and email address to show your custom avatar. Want your own avatar? Sign up here.
If you post an image, please upload to a photo-sharing service like ImageShack or TinyPic and use the link they provide you. Do NOT link directly to the photo's source unless you have permission.
PLEASE report all spam/inappropriate comments using the 'Report to Admin' link. If you find your post gone, it is because you violated the TOS above or it was in reply to a deleted comment.
Comments
This has been my belief all along. A greenhouse requires a physical barrier, we have no such thing on our atmosphere. Heat escapes into space, more heat means more escaping heat. Try removing the roof from your home in winter and crank up the furnace. Only when the Sun comes out and shines down on your frozen carpet, will you notice a little warmth.
Now, can we get on with really important work?
I have mentioned before observations by agricultural engineers who have doubled or tripled the CO2 concentrations in actual greenhouses only to see temperatures drop NOT increase.
The response is "but the atmosphere isn't a greenhouse so we can't expect CO2 to behave the same as it does in an enclosed environment".
That is unless one is using the old, Quote: experiment to validate their theory. In that case the fact that the "evidence" is from an experiment where CO2 in isolation was examined in a closed, controlled environment nothing like the atmosphere well then it's okay.
Lying bastards with no critical thinking skills really piss me off, and so far that seems to be the general characteristic of the AGW supporters.
To rephrase Gator's summary, can we now start fixing the things that actually need fixing?
You'd think at least that they should learn the difference between convection and radiative energy transfer. But the looney lefties make the hollow and obnoxious claim that the data supporting global warming has been "corrected" for that difference--just as they have cooked the books where they say they have accounted for the Urban Heat Island phenomenon.
The Global Warming Collective must be crushed and we are getting the upper hand.
You're right Paul - it's all about the perpetration of the biggest organised crime in human history.
RSS feed for comments to this post