Donate Today!

If you find this site useful and informative, please consider making a small contribution.

Get More News

Follow us on Twitterfacebook_box_blue_48gplus-32

Get a daily email of the day's headlines:

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Latest Comments

  • mas_ttl
    I think they sniffed too much glue building their models! :lol:

    Read more...

     
  • amirlach
    But but the Models... :D

    Read more...

     
  • amirlach
    Maybe not locked up but made to play Jeopardy for the amusment of the unwashed ...

    Read more...

     
  • amirlach
    The exteme leftwing State Broadcaster (CBC)has a near monopoly on Canadian air ...

    Read more...

     
  • Tom
    Hi Gator, I checked the backend and you used a https image which won't work ...

    Read more...

     
  • Gator
    HEAR! Damn laptop...

    Read more...

     
  • Gator
    Did I here right? Is there is a problem with the models? www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJfx0d-mmIo ...

    Read more...

     
  • Gator
    Great analysis Paul! I would only differ by saying sea level rise is not an ...

    Read more...

     
  • Gator
    Nope. Image insert not working. Never mind, carry on... :oops:

    Read more...

     
  • Gator
    i.imgur.com/GVG0H.jpg (http://i.imgur.com/GVG0H.jpg) Any better?

    Read more...

Whistleblower?So now we know who solicited and distributed the Heartland Institute documents.

Peter Gleick has issued a statement (emphasis mine):

At the beginning of 2012, I received an anonymous document in the mail describing what appeared to be details of the Heartland Institute’s climate program strategy. It contained information about their funders and the Institute’s apparent efforts to muddy public understanding about climate science and policy. I do not know the source of that original document but assumed it was sent to me because of my past exchanges with Heartland and because I was named in it.

Given the potential impact however, I attempted to confirm the accuracy of the information in this document. In an effort to do so, and in a serious lapse of my own and professional judgment and ethics, I solicited and received additional materials directly from the Heartland Institute under someone else’s name. The materials the Heartland Institute sent to me confirmed many of the facts in the original document, including especially their 2012 fundraising strategy and budget. I forwarded, anonymously, the documents I had received to a set of journalists and experts working on climate issues. I can explicitly confirm, as can the Heartland Institute, that the documents they emailed to me are identical to the documents that have been made public. I made no changes or alterations of any kind to any of the Heartland Institute documents or to the original anonymous communication.

I will not comment on the substance or implications of the materials; others have and are doing so. I only note that the scientific understanding of the reality and risks of climate change is strong, compelling, and increasingly disturbing, and a rational public debate is desperately needed. My judgment was blinded by my frustration with the ongoing efforts — often anonymous, well-funded, and coordinated — to attack climate science and scientists and prevent this debate, and by the lack of transparency of the organizations involved. Nevertheless I deeply regret my own actions in this case. I offer my personal apologies to all those affected.

Gleick has ruined his personal reputation by his actions, but more importantly, has further sullied the already embattled climate ‘science’ lobby. Andrew Revkin said it best:

One way or the other, Gleick’s use of deception in pursuit of his cause after years of calling out climate deception has destroyed his credibility and harmed others. (Some of the released documents contain information about Heartland employees that has no bearing on the climate fight.) That is his personal tragedy and shame (and I’m sure devastating for his colleagues, friends and family).

The broader tragedy is that his decision to go to such extremes in his fight with Heartland has greatly set back any prospects of the country having the “rational public debate” that he wrote — correctly — is so desperately needed.

DeSmogBlog is calling Gleick a whistleblowing hero, but their own reputation is so tarnished it likely won’t be enough to save his position at the Pacific Institute. Many of the scientific associations and groups to which Gleick belongs will have to  jettison him too, or risk having their own ethics called into question.

Fakegate isn’t quite over yet. Gleick has not admitted to writing the fake memo, so there’s that loose end to tie up.

The green movement hasn’t suffered an own goal this serious since the 10:10 splattergate movie.  On Valentines Day just last week, Peter Gleick was a respected scientist and activist and the Heartland Institute was a privately-funded bogeyman that warmists claimed distributed untold amounts of money into a ‘well-organized climate denial machine.’

Seven days later, we know Peter Gleick is a radical activist who abandoned any pretense of ethics to bring down the ‘opposition’ that frustrated him, and that Heartland’s actual budget is tiny when compared to the big green NGO’s.

Nice work, hippies.

Source

Share/Save/Bookmark

Comments   

 
# Gator 2012-02-21 14:53
It was 'Renewable Guy' who was the slobbering Peter Gleick fan. And I would be willing to bet RG is still a fan of Peters. ;-)

Silly hippies, stay away from the brown acid, and the green Kool-Aid! :lol:
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 

Add comment

Before posting a comment, please read the Terms of Service (click here). Long links are shortened but still work. Emails not shown.

Use your Gravatar username and email address to show your custom avatar. Want your own avatar? Sign up here.

If you post an image, please upload to a photo-sharing service like ImageShack or TinyPic and use the link they provide you. Do NOT link directly to the photo's source unless you have permission.

PLEASE report all spam/inappropriate comments using the 'Report to Admin' link. If you find your post gone, it is because you violated the TOS above or it was in reply to a deleted comment.


Security code
Refresh