“The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge.”
—Daniel J. Boorstin

Major Global PR Firms Refusing to Work with Climate Change Sceptics

solar-panels-wikimediaSome of the world's biggest PR firms have publicly ruled out working with climate change sceptics. The Guardian reports that a number of the top 25 global PR firms responded to a survey saying that they would never represent clients who are sceptical of man-made global warming, or oppose green energy initiatives.

Some of the companies include WPP, Waggener Edstrom (WE) Worldwide, Weber Shandwick, Text100 and Finn Partners.

Rhian Rotz, a spokeswoman for Waggener Edstrom, said: "We would not knowingly partner with a client who denies the existence of climate change."

Weber Shandwick said they would not take on any campaign against renewable energy or carbon controls. "We would not support a campaign that denies the existence and the threat posed by climate change, or efforts to obstruct regulations cutting greenhouse gas emissions and/or renewable energy standards,” a spokeswoman said.

She added, however: "There may be scenarios in which we could represent a client that has different views on climate change, just not on this issue."

WPP said that taking on any client who disputes man-made global warming would violate the company’s guidelines: “We ensure that our own work complies with local laws, marketing codes and our own code of business conduct. These prevent advertising that is intended to mislead and the denial of climate change would fall into this category.”

US-based Edelman, however, did not explicitly rule out taking on climate sceptics. Spokesman Michael Bush said: “We ensure that our own work complies with local laws, marketing codes and our own code of business conduct. These prevent advertising that is intended to mislead and the denial of climate change would fall into this category.” He added that Edelman takes on clients on a case-by-case basis.

Finn Partners’ managing partner, Peter Finn, said: “Finn Partners would not work on any campaigns that deny the reality of climate change nor would we take on a campaign that would obstruct regulations to reduce greenhouse gas emissions or renewable energy standards.”

The firms were responding to separate surveys by the Guardian and the Washington-based Climate Investigations Center, a group who “monitor” opponents of green policies.

Founder Kert Davies is unhappy with PR firms working for major energy lobby groups, such as the American Petroleum Institute, which oppose Barack Obama’s climate change policies.

“For the majority of them, they would rather remain neutral on any issue. They don’t want to have positions on anything because they like to keep options open to take on any client who walks in the door,” Davies said.

“They pretend they are above the fray and they are not involved, and yet they are the ones designing ad campaigns, designing lobbying campaigns, and designing the messages their clients want to convey around climate change.”

Source

 

Pin it

Comments   

# amirlach 2014-08-05 23:08
Nobody "denies" climate changes.

Skeptics question the fiddled data, refuted model predictions and shady methods used by alarmists.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
# amirlach 2014-08-05 23:12
Quote:
WPP said that taking on any client who disputes man-made global warming would violate the company’s guidelines: “We ensure that our own work complies with local laws, marketing codes and our own code of business conduct. These prevent advertising that is intended to mislead and the denial of climate change would fall into this category.”
Yet the manipulated data used to "mislead" the public is just fine?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
# Me 2014-08-06 01:39
I doubt the Biggest PR firms are gona make any difference with the public on this, after all the CAGW crowd has all the Big Green Groups, The LSM, The Government, and even Big Oil throwing Big Money their way and what has it gotten them so far.

Thank You Climate Gate!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
# steve frankes 2014-08-06 01:52
who gives a damn I wont deal with idiots who believe in the climate change scam and I know other companies who wont either. So suck it up.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
# amirlach 2014-08-06 19:56
When you think about it, the people who NEED a PR firm need one for a reason.

They are trying to convince everyone that they are not really lying.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
# Robert 2014-08-06 20:33
Well, they are PR firms and the gist of this article is PR for them. Throw enough money their way and they won't really care who they are partnering with or what they believe. Just as long as the checks clear.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator

Add comment

Before posting a comment, please read the Terms of Service (click here). PLEASE report all SPAM/inappropriate comments using the 'Report to administrator' link. If you find your post gone, it's because you violated the TOS.


Security code
Refresh